David Foster Wallace idea that life consist of
fundamental choices that lie entirely within the human person and allow them to
engage the world differently is true because we are all unique. Everyone sees
the world differently through their eyes and have choices they need to make on
their own. The choices we make as a
human person effect the way we will perceive or see something. Just like he
said about the Christian and the atheists, the atheist tried to believe in God
even when he was stranded in the cold snow weather. He even says he got on his
knees praying to God saying if he would guide him out of the storm and live he
would believe in God, but when the Christian is stumbled because the atheists
is still alive the atheist said there were Eskimos walking by that helped him. The atheist didn’t see the Eskimos as a sign
from God but as a coincidence while the Christian is shocked because he sees
that as a sign or a miracle. We all are our own person where we see and do
things in our own way through choices we make within ourselves.
This
idea of thinking is defiantly creditable because again we are all different
from one another and the way you and I see something is going to be different.
The choices we make within ourselves will ultimately define who we are and what
we believe in. The way we see the world is how we make our choices because one
person may think our world is corrupt and ruined the other may be thinking our
world is fine and dandy, but it is all based on our fundamental choices is the
way we see the world. Wallace even says that we automatically think about
ourselves, our surrounding and what we choose to do and how to think. We figure
out what we want to see because we decide what we want to worship, he also says
that there is no such thing as an atheist because we all want to believe in
something and worship someone. The thing is we are the ones who get to choose
that and when we think for ourselves we choose what we want for us.
I
engage in our default-setting of choice as something we all do every day. We
all make decisions for ourselves unconsciously in our default- setting and it
happens to me just as Wallace talked about how in every experience we see
ourselves as the center and that our needs are real, immediate and urgent. We
all can be taught something, but the way
we learn and see it will still be different from someone else. Wallace talks
about us thinking for ourselves and it is true everyone always think of what
they want first and not consider everyone else and what kind of life they live
or struggles they may go through. Choice is how we make decisions and how we
get first impressions of someone without even meeting them. Choice is something
we can’t be taught, but can be influenced. Meaning, when Wallace talked about
going to the grocery store at a time where there’s a lot of others he says that
they are all their with the same mind set to get a little shopping done after
work like you (student) are when you come back from a long day at work. People
can make similar choices to others as well as have influenced ideas such as
getting some shopping after work because you see, like others, that it’s a
convenient time.
The
question “how would I like to engage this choice” is something difficult to
answer because my default-setting unconsciously makes decision that I like and
make me the center. If I could go against it or train myself I would like to
not only think of myself as the center but for others who are in need of help.
No matter what we are all hardwired to a default-setting as a way we think and
automatically see our needs first. Even if we are trying to help someone we
still choose to think of our self first and how making a choice to help someone
will affect us I a good or bad way. Wallace whole idea, in my opinion, is that
he is trying to say that we should all train our default-setting of thinking of
ourselves as the center of our experiences and that in the end true freedom
involves attention, awareness, effort and discipline to truly care about others
and be able to sacrifice for them over and over even though our alternative is
unconsciousness and default-setting of thinking.
While
Wallace was talking there were people who laughed, chuckled and clapped at his
speech at time where he was being ironic, or even challenging the way they
engage the world. The people clapped when he
pretty much is insulting them because he used experience that they all
could relate to and had a shared experience with. Wallace was insulting the bad
and irritating experiences such as grocery shopping and even traffic. The
people saw what he said relatable to what they have done before or have heard
about. In his speech Wallace was using relatable experiences to get people to
understand what he was trying to convey or see in his speech. He wanted
everyone listening to be able to see and say “oh yea that’s happened to me” or
“oh I really didn’t think I did that when I’m in traffic but I guess I do”.
Wallace was just trying to share with everyone how they engage the world and
what they may do unconsciously with their default-setting way of thinking. In
the end his speech was great and made a lot of sense especially using
experiences that everyone could relate to and thinks about from the way he
presented it.
No comments:
Post a Comment